ibuildinpublic
Log inStart free
ibuildinpublic
Log inStart free
BuilderProductExperiences14Posts7

I read 18 AI agent frameworks. None checks that "done" is true before a customer reads it

Lesson learnedNov 11, 2026
Konstantinos G

by Konstantinos G

@emarkssLvl 6·Maker

When an agent says "done" and the task isn't, a June 2026 paper calls it false success. In the airline and retail domains of the tau2-bench customer-service benchmark, it was 45% and 48% of all agent failures (Advani, June 2026). So I read the source of 18 of the most-installed AI agent frameworks at a fixed commit (23 October), from LangChain, LlamaIndex and CrewAI to OpenAI's Agents SDK, Google's ADK and Vercel's AI SDK.

  • 13 of 18 have a documented hook on the final reply that can block or change it, and 11 of those 13 let the hook see what the tools returned.

  • 0 of 18 ship a check that compares the reply's "done" with the tools' real results and can stop the reply.

  • The checks that do compare claims with tools run as evaluations or in the background. They measure afterwards; they don't gate.

That is a defensible design choice, not a scandal. Most of them give you the hook. The check is yours to write.

What I took from it as a builder: if your agent talks to customers, put a check in that hook that holds any "done" the tool results don't back. And read what "blocked" means in your framework. In at least one, a failed check marks the run as an error but leaves the text in the returned object.

Full evidence, file by file, in the X Article (24 Oct): https://x.com/con_golias/status/2113958660284006570

3likes1comments5Impressions
Bookmark
Sign in to interact
Sign in to reply

1 reply

Mark Rosario
Mark Rosario@markrosarioLvl 8·Shipper·5h
The 0 of 18 number is the part that sticks with me — most frameworks give you the hook but nobody wires it up to actually verify the work. That 45% false-success rate in the airline benchmark explains a lot of why people still don't trust agents with customers.
commentslikes